Assignent Solutionnurs

3-1 Application Activity: Addressing Obesity in Jordan
Listen
ReadSpeaker webReader: Listen
Focus
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin™
Turnitin™ enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.
Instructions
This activity will provide you with an opportunity to analyze historical policies, practices, and partnerships through examining a case study.
Your work on this application activity will inform your work on the background section of Milestone Two, which is due in Module Five.
To complete this assignment, review the following documents:
Module Three Application Activity Guidelines and Rubric PDF
Module Three Application Activity Worksheet Word Document
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Module Three Application Activity Rubric
Print Rubric
Criteria
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Criterion Score
Private and Public Partnerships
30 points
Analyzes private and public partnerships for their role in addressing obesity in the past
21 points
Analyzes private and public partnerships for their role in addressing obesity in the past, but analysis is cursory or contains inaccuracies
0 points
Does not analyze private and public partnerships for their role in addressing obesity in the past
Score of Private and Public Partnerships,/ 30
Gaps and Strengths in Historical Interventions
30 points
Determines gaps and strengths in historical interventions and their role in addressing obesity and supports response with appropriate evidence
21 points
Determines gaps and strengths in historical interventions and their role in addressing obesity, but response lacks detail, is missing specific gaps or strengths, or is not supported by evidence
0 points
Does not determine gaps and strengths in historical interventions and their role in addressing obesity
Score of Gaps and Strengths in Historical Interventions,/ 30
Gaps in Collaborative Work Plan or the Implementation Plan
30 points
Determines gaps in the collaborative work plan or the implementation plan developed by the stakeholders and supports response with appropriate evidence
21 points
Determines gaps in the collaborative work plan or the implementation plan developed by the stakeholders, but response lacks details, is missing specific gaps, or is not supported by evidence
0 points
Does not determine gaps in the collaborative work plan or the implementation plan developed by the stakeholders
Score of Gaps in Collaborative Work Plan or the Implementation Plan,/ 30
Articulation of Response
10 points
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
7 points
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
0 points
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
Score of Articulation of Response,/ 10
Total
Score of Module Three Application Activity Rubric,/ 100
Overall Score
Proficient
71 points minimum
Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.
Needs Improvement
1 point minimum
Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.
Not Evident
0 points minimum
Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.