Assignent Solutionnurs

will be provided later
Dissertation – Systematic Review – 12.000 words
My research question is this.. “Is McKenzie effective for treating the neck in elderly individuals?”
– If, after investigating, you are unable to locate 8–12 primary studies that could be incorporated into this systematic review, feel free to revise my research topic.-
Qualitative review (thematic analysis, narrative synthesis) OR quantitative review (metanalysis), explaining why you didn’t / Did utilise it. For this review, stick to a single methodology and don’t combine any. Choose one option only: quantitative review or qualitative evaluation.
Limitation and strengths
– Discuss bias under “limitations and strengths” ( it must be acknowledged the risck of bias, limitation e.g. not being able to work in a group and strength e.g. being able to have a supervisor, another limitation is that the narrative synthesis lacks precision, there is no excepted or form of techniques with the narrative synthesis, )
Academic writing level 7
Review Design
In this systematic review, the PICO model suited to quantitative research
The results of PICO analysis are shown below:
Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome
Data Extraction Form
Key Elements
Data Extraction Form Template (2017)
https://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/Resources-for-authors2017/good_practice_data_extraction_form.doc
– For each study needs to be done a table
6. Data analysis
7. Timetable
8. References (including 8-12 primary research studies)
https://www.prisma-statement.org//PRISMAStatemtnt/flowDiagram
Appendix A: Search string
Appendix B: Databases/ search engines
Appendix C: preliminary search history from
Appendix D:Trials identified during preliminary searching
Appendix E: Critical appraisal tool
Appendix F: Data extraction form
USE Prisma (PRISMA is an evidence-based minimum set of items for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses)
https://www.prisma-statement.org//PRISMAStatement/FlowDiagram
Data Extraction Form Template (2017) – https://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/Resources-for-authors2017/good_practice_data_extraction_form.doc
Adapted From Cornell University Library (2022)
https://guides.library.cornell.edu/evidence-synthesis/data-extraction
We were given the following link as an illustration of a systematic review.
https://paahjournal.com/articles/10.5334/paah.190
www.casp-uk.net (critical appraisal skills programme (CASP)
https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/ (to evaluate the literature)
http://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools (to assist in evaluating trust Worthing)
https://training.cochrane.org/sites/training.cochrane.org/files/public/iploads/resources/Hanbook5_1/Chapter_8_Handbook_5_2_8pdf – ( Quality & Risk of Bias?)