Assignent Solutionnurs

Research Project module Master programme in public Health Promotion. This Recommended Resources must be used. Please look at the link below about Prisma-Scoping reviews: https://www.prisma-statement.org/Extensions/ScopingReviews THE TITLE OF THE ASSIGNMENT/ASSIGNMENT QUESTION: THE IMPACT OF STANDARDISED PACKAGING OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS REGULATIONS ON TOBACCO USE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND AUSTRALIA: A SCOPING REVIEW. This study explores the current available evidence on the impact of Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations on tobacco use in the UK. The following objectives of the study include: 1. To search the literature to identify the impact of Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products regulations on tobacco use in the UK. 2. To review the literature and to synthesize the research evidence using a Thematic content Analysis on the impact Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products regulations on tobacco use in the UK. 3. To provide a summary of the findings and provide recommendations to public health initiatives to help increase awareness in research gaps that will enable recommendations for the future research. Please is it possible to send me the introduction and literature review within 12hour of this order please? Please see the attached Scoping Review structure for this Research Project module. Research project assessment brief Assessment Method. A manuscript, formatted and fully referenced, according to the style appropriate to the proposed journal in a publishable format. 100% (5000 words). Submission Learning Outcomes (A) Knowledge and Understanding 1. Demonstrate the knowledge to test, critique, and create evidence that are appropriate to public health and health promotion. 2. Demonstrate an understanding of the research and its limitations (B) Cognitive (thinking) Skills 1. Demonstrate a critical ability to refine and specify a research question(s). 2. Demonstrate an ability to critically synthesise the literature. 3. Demonstrate an ability to determine the most appropriate method for addressing the research questions. 4. Demonstrate an ability to critically appraise the outcome of research (C) Other Skills and Attributes (Practical/Professional/Transferable) 1. Demonstrate a critical ability to present the process and findings of a research project in written form appropriate for professional and academic consumption within public health and health promotion. Assessment Overview The Research Project is designed to be a student-led, research-based module, anchored on providing students with the relevant academic and transferable skills. Practical skills and experience are important to career development, and as such, this module has been designed with particular emphasis on developing relevant practical skills linked to your careers. This module aims to stimulate whilst encouraging deep learning and reflection, and therefore facilitates an independent learning approach, as a level of autonomy in learning needs to be achieved by the students themselves. It aims to motivate you to continuously acquire knowledge about contemporary theories, models, and complex research practices. You will need to understand and apply knowledge through interpretation of material, critical analysis, and evaluation to develop a comprehensive research paper. Key Components and Task: The final assessment for his module is to undertake a self-led research project which is presented as a manuscript, formatted and fully referenced, according to the style appropriate to a proposed journal in a publishable format for the work. 100% (5000 words). Structure to adhere to • Introduction • Literature Review • Research Design / Methodology • Analysis, Findings, Discussion and Conclusions and Recommendations You will also need to include: • Title page • Abstract of the research • Author’s declarations, including statement of originality • Acknowledgements • Table of contents • List of tables • List of figures • List of appendices • References • Appendices Special Instructions: • Within your Appendices please include a copy of your approved ethics forms • You should select a suitable journal for your subject area to which you would wish to submit your work. These could include: • BMJ open • BMC Public Health • BMC Health Services • Journal of Public Health • Frontiers in Public Health • American Journal of Public Health • European journal of Public Health • Lancet Public Health • Lancet Global Health Research Project Structure for Scoping Review Introduction • Research Background and Context • Research question(s) (PICO framework) • Objectives Literature Review Provides a general literature review using the following criteria: • Length should be about 500 words • Needs to provide a search strategy • Should be general around the research topic with focus on justifying the need for the review • Should not include publications which are part of the results of the review itself (included in results of the search strategy). Methods Provide a clear statement of the RQ/s and Objectives. Describe the approaches and procedures used in: • Searching for the sources/articles • Selecting the sources/articles • Extracting the sources/articles Word count limit 5000 words for the student research, you may consider reviewing between 10 – 25 articles/sources Results • The results do require a high level of in-depth analysis. • Results could be broader and more qualitative where you can use thematic presentation of the findings from all included publications based on what you are looking for and what are presented in the publications. • Results could be presented in table format as follows: Summary of Key Findings/Evidences Number of Supporting Sources Proportion of Supporting Sources (%) Study Designs Applied Settings (countries or regions) Covered Period Covered (Years) Additional Comments Discussions • Reviewing the evidence in relation to the research objectives and questions • Reviewing the findings in comparison/contrast with other key findings/evidence (of various study designs including scoping review, if any) from the literature review • Observed limitations of the study (Scoping Review in study context) Conclusion • Summarizing the evidence in relation to the research objectives and questions • Describe the Public Health Policy/Health Promotion Implications of the evidence • Recommendations for applications References (in Harvard Reference Style) Appendices (Signed Ethics declaration form and the rest as applicable) Adopted from Peters et al (2015). Peters, ., Godfrey, ., McInerney, K. H., Parker, D., and Baldini Soares C. (2015) ‘Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews’, Int J Evid Based Health. 13(3), pp. 141-146. Available at: