Assignent Solutionnurs

National Capacity Assessment Background Using a background in capacity planning, combined with the readings up to this point, conduct a national disaster management capacity assessment of Ethiopia. Reading previously submitted self-assessments conducted by several countries under the Hyogo Framework for Action may provide more insight into the varied capacities that exist. An example is provided below. Example: Tanzania, United Rep of National progress report on the implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action (2013-2015) Guidelines Conduct a national capacity assessment for Ethiopia. Ethiopia is likely to request some level of disaster assistance in the coming years, and assess their national disaster management systems as if you were working for an entity interested in either collaborating with that national government or building their capacity. This assessment should include a short summary of the key disaster risks facing the country, as well as any relevant infrastructure analysis. Resources that may be helpful for this activity include: • Country disaster profile resources o Preventionweb o Reliefweb o World Bank GFDRR Country Disaster Risk Profiles o SFDRR-related guidance Format Your response paper should be between 750-1000 words [3-4 pages]. Graphics are welcome and encouraged but will not count towards page count. Upload and submit your paper in DOC or DOCX format. Use APA Style Sample briefing format The following are the common components of a briefing document: Summary of the issue and the main points of the briefing. Issue – States what has happened, is happening, will happen or might happen that requires a decision maker’s attention. Background – Historical or other information that the decision-maker would need to know on the issue. Considerations – This section can include the key details of the briefing, or may refer to attached annexes. Types of information incorporated can include: the current status of the issue and relevance to needs and strategic priorities; pros and cons of options, including feasibility, costs, benefits and risk implications for existing programming; and communications or optics implications. A SWOT analysis may also be relevant, exploring associated political, economic, social, budgetary, infrastructure, legal and ecological factors. Conclusion – Answers the question “So what?”, and, if relevant, states the organization’s position on the issue. Recommendations must do more than state the desired outcome. This section should outline steps the decision-maker/organization must take to bring about the desired outcome. Sources – All relevant citations.