Assignent Solutionnurs

Literature Review related to Integrative Paper assignment In this assignment, you will build on the research and reading you’ve done over the past several weeks to synthesize the scholarly literature around an issue of supervisory practice. This literature review serves as an important foundation for your final Integrative Paper. This review of the literature needs to be distinctly focused on content related to SW 855 (administrative, ethical, support supervision). Instructions This assignment is an opportunity to identify and evaluate the scholarly literature related to supervision in your area of interest and to write a review of the literature that will serve as a foundation for the literature review section of your final Integrative Paper. For the purposes of this assignment, provide a clearly-written synthesis of 8-12 relevant peer-reviewed articles that address some aspect of best practices that will inform your supervisory practice. These may include assigned readings but should also reflect your independent review of the literature. Grading Guidelines This assignment is incorporated into your formative assignment grade, which accounts for 40% of the course, and will be graded using the Literature Review Rubric posted below. This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Synthesis of Ideas 12 pts Meets or Exceeds Expectations Paper provides clearly analysis and synthesis of the relevant scholarly literature. 6 pts Meets Minimal Expectations Paper demonstrates some analysis and synthesis of appropriate scholarly literature. 0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Paper does not successfully synthesize the scholarly literature under review. 12 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Readability/Mechanics 4 pts Meets or Exceeds Expectations Writing quality is excellent. Topic is clearly defined. Ideas are clearly organized and well developed. 2 pts Meets Minimal Expectations Writing quality is adequate. 0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Writing quality is unacceptable for the doctoral level. 4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome References 4 pts Meets or Exceeds Expectations Citations and reference page follow APA format. 2 pts Meets Minimal Expectations Citations and reference page follow APA format most of the time but a few errors/inconsistencies are evident. 0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Citations and reference page are largely inconsistent in regards to the APA format. 4 pts