Assignent Solutionnurs

Investigate one of the following disease processes: COPD, metabolic syndrome, hepatitis C, or chronic kidney disease. Analyze and describe the pathophysiology of the disease process and discuss the evidence-based pharmacological treatments in your state and how they affect management of the disease in your community. (3/4 – 1 page) Discuss the clinical guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and patient education for the disease process. (3/4 – 1 page) Analyze how the disease process affects patients, families, and populations in communities. (3/4 – 1 page) Discuss briefly three strategies you could use to implement best practices for managing the disease in your current healthcare organization. (3/4 – 1 page) The body of your paper needs to be 3-4 pages long. This does NOT include the title page and reference page. Papers that are more than 4 pages long will not be accepted. You must reference a minimum of two (2) scholarly sources on your paper and reference national guidelines. Rubric NURS_663A_DE – Case Study Paper Rubric NURS_663A_DE – Case Study Paper Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Case Review 27 to >24.84 pts Accomplished Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). Provides a rich and detailed explanation to the questions. Description leaves the reader with a “holistic” picture of the patient’s history, diagnosis, management, treatment, and/or education. 24.84 to >22.14 pts Satisfactory Demonstrates a good understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). Provides a detailed explanation to the questions. Description leaves the reader with a “holistic” picture of the patient’s history, diagnosis, management, treatment, and/or education. 22.14 to >18.63 pts Needs Improvement Demonstrates a fair understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). Provides a somewhat detailed explanation to the questions. Description leaves the reader with a fairly good “holistic” picture of the patient’s history, diagnosis, management, treatment, and/or education. 18.63 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Demonstrates a lack of understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). Provides a less than adequate explanation to the questions. Sufficient detail of the patient’s medical and surgical background is lacking. 27 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis of Findings 34 to >31.28 pts Accomplished Provides an in- depth, critical analysis of case study activity findings together with appropriate literature. Student insightfully and appropriately connects findings to specific clinical concepts, using carefully selected quotes, principles, and/or theories cited from course readings. 31.28 to >27.88 pts Satisfactory Provides a fairly in- depth, critical analysis of case study activity findings together with appropriate literature. Student generally insightfully and appropriately connects findings to specific clinical concepts, mostly using carefully selected quotes, principles, and/or theories cited from course readings. 27.88 to >23.46 pts Needs Improvement Provides a somewhat thoughtful analysis of literature review. Student connects findings to clinical concepts; however, specific quotes, principles, or theories may be lacking or examples may not always be used appropriately. Connection to data gathered is not present or minimal. 23.46 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Analysis of literature review together with case study findings lacks depth and/or connection. Student makes few connections or inappropriate connections among findings, course concepts and data gathered in the field. 34 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Application and Evaluation 34 to >31.28 pts Accomplished Consistently Illuminates knowledge and insights to be gained from case study. Discusses specific ways reader can use “lessons learned” in future clinical practices, outlining specific concrete action steps he/she recommends. 31.28 to >27.88 pts Satisfactory In general, illuminates knowledge and insights to be gained from case study. Generally discusses specific ways reader can use “lessons learned” in future clinical practices, outlining specific concrete action steps he/she recommends. 27.88 to >23.46 pts Needs Improvement Highlights some knowledge and insights to be gained from case study. Discusses ways reader can use “lessons learned” in future teaching practices; however, future applications to practice may be vague and/or lack concrete action steps he/she recommends. 23.46 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Few highlights offered regarding knowledge and insights to be gained from case study. Provides little to no discussion of how reader should apply “lessons learned” to future clinical practices. 34 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization 15 to >13.8 pts Accomplished Presents ideas thoughtfully and in-depth. Ideas are coherently and logically organized. Has an effective writing style, marked by language that is free from errors in mechanics, usage, and sentence structure. 13.8 to >12.3 pts Satisfactory Presents most ideas thoughtfully and in-depth. Ideas are generally coherently and logically organized. Has an effective writing style, marked by language that is generally free from errors in mechanics, usage, and sentence structure. 12.3 to >10.35 pts Needs Improvement Presents ideas in a way that shows some depth and complexity. Organization may be somewhat inconsistent. Ideas and language flow well overall, but errors in mechanics, usage, and sentence structure distract from the content. 10.35 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory May present ideas in a simplistic and/or repetitive fashion. Ideas may be marginally developed or poorly organized. Language has an accumulation of errors in mechanics, usage, and sentence structure. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evidence-based Research 15 to >13.8 pts Accomplished Supplements case study with relevant and appropriate research into the present case study; clearly and thoroughly documents all sources of information. 13.8 to >12.3 pts Satisfactory Supplements case study with relevant and somewhat thorough research into the present case study; generally correctly documents all sources of information. 12.3 to >10.35 pts Needs Improvement Supplements case study with little relevant research into the present case study; not all sources of information are clearly and thoroughly documented. 10.35 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Does not supplement case study with relevant research into the present case study; does not appropriately document all sources of information. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA and Mechanics 15 to >13.8 pts Accomplished The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly. 13.8 to >12.3 pts Satisfactory The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly. 12.3 to >10.35 pts Needs Improvement The assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing where needed. 10.35 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory No attempt to follow APA format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper. 15 pts Total Points: 140