Assignent Solutionnurs

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iv8NgPzALL3JUqht-aROm400mHkFlUKj/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Qol60SpeLzwKFsCR6HKozuhXYC0zOu1U/view?usp=sharing There are 2 more attachments that I will be sending via email as the system did not allow me to attach all of them. Please find included as attachments and emails the following: Instructions for this paper (These will also be below); Template on how to format and write the work; Case Study on what the work needs to be about; Textbooks and background information (for citation and in-dept information); Sample reports (and another case conceptualization BY SOMEONE ELSE (these were provided by the professor and should be used as an outline, do not copy!); and other information to help you write this paper. This paper should be around 3-5 pages – INCLUDING A REFERENCE LIST. It should include in report citations. Case Conceptualization and Treatment/Monitoring Plan Paper Instructions and Grading Rubric: The rationales of this assignment are to give you practice (a) conceptualizing a forensic case for case management purposes, and (b) generating a forensic intervention plan that corresponds to your case conceptualization. or this assignment, you are to (1) review the provided risk–needs–responsivity assessment tool case study material (on course Canvas site); (2) provide a narrative conceptualization of the case study using a risk–needs–responsivity–strengths model; (3) generate recommendations for the supervision program/placement (community or custodial) decision, and a case management and review plan (regarding intervention services); and (4) cite in APA Style all reading highlights (and optionally and optionally recommended or extra credit-related readings) that informed how you conceptualized the case and generated the treatment plan. Grading criteria Possible points Points assigned Narratively conceptualized the case study using a risk– needs–responsivity–strengths model (yes, somewhat, no) 6 In conceptualizing the case, provided inferences about the developmental trajectory of the case study’s risk and strength factors, and the interplay among the risk factors and strength factors in the case (yes, somewhat, no) 2 Provided supervisory recommendations with supporting logic (yes, somewhat, no) 2 Provided intervention services recommendations and a case review plan for the youth and family, with supporting logic (yes, somewhat, no) 6 Case conceptualization and treatment plan reflected content (models, services, etc.) from several readings, cited in APA Style (yes, somewhat no) 4 Total 2 Common comments about early-submitted case conceptualizations and treatmentmonitoring plans: • Proofread for typos, grammatical errors, formatting inconsistencies, and so forth. Make the report look professional. • Ensure correct APA style reference style in-text and in the references list. • Put things into more narrative form. • Make sure the “risk” of what negative outcome is clear (look up what the YLS/CMI predicts). • Summarize the YLS/CMI results (e.g., risk level, criminogenic needs levels). • Further specify the YLS/CMI results (e.g., risk level, criminogenic needs levels). • How should providers utilize Jack’s responsivity and strength factors in delivering services? • Specify the level of supervision you’re envisioning (e.g., community-based, custodial) and your recommended parameters (e.g., frequency of contact with probation officer?, any probation restrictions that you’d recommend?), and why. • Would you tie any of the measurement of change to YLS/CMI domains? • Further specify an instrumental and ultimate outcomes monitoring plan (e.g., how often will change be assessed?, how much do risk and criminogenic needs need to change for services discontinuation? who should do the measurement and coordinate it all via case management?). • Make sure your outcomes are clearly measurable in behavioral terms. • Would you recommend any individual referrals for Jack’s mother? • Ensure the scope of your recommendations is adequate, and further specify delivery parameters (frequency, etc.). • Know the age range for recommended treatments (e.g., Parent-Child Interaction Therapy is for children, not adolescents). • In general, tie all services explanations specifically to how it will apply to Jack’s case. • Who’s going to be doing the measuring you propose, or overall case management.