Assignent Solutionnurs

eek 4 Discussion: Your patient has a Personal Health Record… Now what? (graded) 99 unread replies.99 replies. Purpose This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following Course Outcomes (COs). • CO4 Investigate safeguards and decision-making support tools embedded in patient care technologies and information systems to support a safe practice environment for both patients and healthcare workers. (PO 4) • CO5 Identify patient care technologies, information systems, and communication devices that support safe nursing practice. (PO 5) Due Date • During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): o Posts in the discussion at least two times, and o Posts in the discussion on two different days Points Possible 50 points Directions • Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students: o Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week o Integrate outside scholarly sources when required o Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor o Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner • Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers. • Best Practices include: o Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor. o Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts. o Select different classmates for your reply each week. Discussion Question Case Study: A 65-year-old woman was just been diagnosed with Stage 3 non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. She was informed of this diagnosis in her primary care physician’s office. She leaves her physician’s office and goes home to review all of her tests and lab results with her family. She goes home and logs into her PHR. She is only able to pull up a portion of her test results. She calls her physician’s office with this concern. The office staff discussed that she had part of her lab work completed at a lab not connected to the organization, part was completed at the emergency room, and part was completed in the lab that is part of the doctor’s office organization. The above scenario might be a scenario that you have commonly worked with in clinical practice. For many reasons, patients often receive healthcare from multiple organizations that might have different systems. As you review this scenario, reflect and answer these questions for this discussion. • What are the pros and cons of the situation in the case study? • What safeguards are included in patient portals and PHRs to help patients and healthcare professionals ensure safety? • Do you agree or disagree with the way that a patient obtains Personal Health Records (PHRs)? • What are challenges for patients that do not have access to all of the PHRs? Remember, only portions of the EHRs are typically included in the PHRs. • RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21 RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21 Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnswer Post •Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner, and •Demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts 16 pts 100% Excellent Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner and demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts. 14 pts 88% Good Answers the discussion question(s) but detail is lacking, and demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of course concepts. 13 pts 80% Fair Partially answers the discussion question(s) and partially demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts. 6 pts 38% Poor Minimally answers the discussion question(s) and minimally demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts. 0 pts 0% Missing Does not answer the discussion question(s). 16 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Sources •Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson, •Integrates evidence from at least one outside scholarly source, •All sources are credited within the body of the post, •Evidence supports the discussion, and •APA format is not required but is encouraged. 12 pts 100% Excellent Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson AND from at least one outside scholarly source. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion. 11 pts 88% Good Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion. 10 pts 80% Fair Integrates evidence from outside scholarly source only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion. 5 pts 38% Poor Lists sources at conclusion of post but does not integrate/credit evidence into body of post OR integrates evidence but evidence does not support the discussion. 0 pts 0% Missing Does not integrate any evidence. 12 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReply Post •Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post, •Reply post provides additional information or clarification, and •Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion. 14 pts 100% Excellent Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion. 12 pts 88% Good Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion. 11 pts 80% Fair Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion. 5 pts 38% Poor Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion. 0 pts 0% Missing No reply post to classmates or instructor. 14 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunicates Professionally All posts: •are clear and concise, •are respectful, civil, and caring, and •contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and punctuation. 8 pts 100% Excellent All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. 7 pts 88% Good All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. 6 pts 80% Fair All posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. 3 pts 38% Poor All posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. 0 pts 0% Missing All posts are not respectful, civil, and caring. 8 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Posts in the discussion at least two times, and •Posts in the discussion on two different days 0 pts No Points Deducted During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Posts in the discussion at least two times, and •Posts in the discussion on two different days 0 pts Points Deducted (-5 Points) During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times AND/OR •Does NOT post in the discussion o