Assignent Solutionnurs

LEADERSHIP IN A GLOBAL WORLD Nursing program (Registered nurse RN) Discussion 4 1. Find a Board that you would be interested in serving on. Why does the board interest you? How would you prepare and pursue an opportunity to serve on the Board? 2. Discuss the Press Ganey-National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI). Review the list of indicators and give two examples of indicators that demonstrate the importance of a registered nurse(RN) in improving patient care. 3. How can public reporting drive improvements in healthcare? Identify a measure that is not publicly reported. Why should the measure be publicly reported? What measures would you take as a healthcare professional to educate the public on the importance of monitoring this measure. Please, answer the discussion questions with 4 pages response requiring 4-5 evidence-based practice or research articles to support your discussion. Your responses need to address all components of the discussion topic. In scholarly writing, first person is not to be used. Minimize your use of pronouns. References in APA format at the end of discussion. Please, pay attention when you cite 2 or more authors . Please refer to APA how to cite. It’s important. Thanks Grading Rubric for Discussion Posts* * the slash separates score for initial discussion posting and follow-up posting A grading rubric is used to determine the student’s grade for the initial and follow-up discussion posts. Content Organization and Completeness Critical Thinking Writing 5/3 The writer has an excellent grasp of the content, elaborates fully on the points that are made, and provides comments and new information that contribute to furthering the topic. Gives illustrations and examples. 5/3 The writings are very well organized, and ideas and information are true and supported by the readings and connected to the question or the issue. The response or answer makes sense. Statements and ideas flow from/to one another. Ideas that support one another are connected. 5/3 The writing /discussion shows much careful thought and much insight gained about the issue at hand. The writer can pose original, interesting questions about the issue(s). Thoughts and conclusions are supported with good reasons. 5/1 The writing is lively, expressive, and engaging. Word choice is precise and rich. Sentences flow nicely. There are no errors in grammar, punctuation, or spelling. APA formatting and referencing is correct. Readings, references used beyond required text. There is no first person in the post. 3/2 The writer has a moderate grasp of the content but there are some misunderstandings on the points that are made, and minimal information that contributes to furthering the topic. 3/2 The writings are moderately organized and make sense and some ideas and information are true and supported by the readings and connected to the question or the issue. Statements and ideas flow from/to one another and are somewhat connected. 3/2 The writing /discussion show some careful thought and insight about most of, but not all issues are fully engaged, and insights could stand more development Thoughts and discussions/conclusions could be better supported from the readings. 3/0 The writings /discussions are pleasant, acceptable and mostly mechanically correct, but there may still be typos and spelling errors that interfere with the reading. First person is noted in the post. 1/1 The writer has only a superficial or fuzzy understanding of the content. There are several misunderstandings or false claims that do not contribute to furthering the topic. 1/1 The writings lack a coherent structure and statements and ideas do not flow smoothly from /to one another. 1/1 Not much thought went into the writings /discussions and lack interesting or significant insights and conclusions/ideas are not well supported from the readings. 0/0 Sentences are choppy, incomplete, rambling, or awkward, or there may be many spelling typos or errors. Ideas are difficult to comprehend without rereading.