Assignent Solutionnurs

Create: Professional Outcomes Presentation
Professional Outcomes Paper Instructions
For this assignment you will be creating a Professional Outcomes Presentation detailing various aspects of your future nursing career. This assignment will be created using Microsoft PowerPoint.
The Professional Outcomes Power Point presentation is due the end of week 7. Prepare a presentation of no more than 10-12 power point slides (not counting title slide and reference slide) which address the following:
A title slide depicting your name and nursing status
A background slide outlining your goals and objectives. Use the information from your paper.
Include slides about what you have learned are the key issues and challenges for nurses today.
Create a future implications slide and describe what you think are present and future implications for nurses with respect to skills and competencies.
Finally, close with how you will contribute to nursing’s future and meet nursing’s key issues and challenges
Create a reference slide and put all references used in presentation.
Three (3) professional references are required.
Add presenter notes to the slide which enhance the content of the slides, as if you were presenting to a group, and this is your script. In PPT, access “notes view” to see the presenter notes boxes. Slides should not contain paragraphs of narrative. They should contain only bullet points or brief explanations. The longer narratives go in your presenter notes.
For format and guidelines for PPT presentations check out the Purdue Online Writing Lab website here (Links to an external site.).
(Links to an external site.)
Instructions on how to use speakers notes in PowerPoint can be found here (Links to an external site.).
Rubric
NU305 Unit 7 Assignment – Professional Outcomes Presentation
NU305 Unit 7 Assignment – Professional Outcomes Presentation
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Knowledge
PRICE-I
25 pts
Level 5
Connects and extends knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
22.5 pts
Level 4
Analyzes knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline making relevant connections to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
20 pts
Level 3
Begins to connect knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline to civic engagement and to tone’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
17.5 pts
Level 2
Begins to identify knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline that is relevant to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
15 pts
Level 1
There Is some evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline that is somewhat relevant to civics engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
0 pts
Level 0
There is little to no evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline that is somewhat relevant to civics engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefines Content
NU305-CO6;NU305-CO8;NU305-CO9
25 pts
Level 5
Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
22.5 pts
Level 4
Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.
20 pts
Level 3
Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
17.5 pts
Level 2
Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.
15 pts
Level 1
Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement. life, politics, and government.
0 pts
Level 0
There is no evidence of a defined statement.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Relationship to Research
PRICE-I
10 pts
Level 5
Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
9 pts
Level 4
Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.
8 pts
Level 3
Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
7 pts
Level 2
Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.
6 pts
Level 1
Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement. life, politics, and government.
0 pts
Level 0
There is no evidence of a defined statement.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion and Related Outcomes
25 pts
Level 5
Conclusions (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.
22.5 pts
Level 4
Conclusions are logically tied to and reflect student’s informed evaluation in priority order and are clearly identified.
20 pts
Level 3
Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information and are identified clearly.
17.5 pts
Level 2
Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion).
15 pts
Level 1
Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed and oversimplified.
0 pts
Level 0
Conclusion is either not present, unclear, or does not reflect the information presented.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing
10 pts
Level 5
The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
9 pts
Level 4
The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling and minor error do not impair the flow of communication.
8 pts
Level 3
The paper exhibits an acceptable command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.
7 pts
Level 2
The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
6 pts
Level 1
The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
0 pts
Level 0
The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA
PRICE-I
5 pts
Level 5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.
4.5 pts
Level 4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
4 pts
Level 3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
3.5 pts
Level 2
The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
1 pts
Level 1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.
0 pts
Level 0
There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.
5 pts