Assignent Solutionnurs

Concepts of Theory
4 points
Criteria Description
Concepts of Theory
5. Excellent
4 points
Discussion of the concepts of the theory that make it most appropriate for the client in the case study is thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported.Discussion of concepts of the theory demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
4. Good
3.48 points
Discussion of the concepts of the theory that make it most appropriate for the client in the case study is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of concepts of the theory demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.
3. Satisfactory
3.16 points
Discussion of the concepts of the theory that make it most appropriate for the client in the case study is accurate and complete.Discussion of concepts of the theory demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
2.96 points
Discussion of the concepts of the theory that make it most appropriate for the client in the case study is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of concepts of the theory demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of the concepts of the theory that make it most appropriate for the client in the case study is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of concepts of the theory does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
collapse Chosen Theory assessment
Chosen Theory
4 points
Criteria Description
Chosen Theory
5. Excellent
4 points
Discussion of the reason for choosing one theory over the others is thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported.Explanation for the chosen theory demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
4. Good
3.48 points
Discussion of the reason for choosing one theory over the other(s) is thorough and well-reasoned.Explanation for the chosen theory demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.
3. Satisfactory
3.16 points
Discussion of the reason for choosing one theory over the other(s) is accurate and complete.Explanation for the chosen theory demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
2.96 points
Discussion of the reason for choosing one theory over the other(s) is incomplete or flawed.Explanation for the chosen theory demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of the reason for choosing one theory over the other(s) is not present or not discernible to the reader.Explanation for the chosen theory does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
collapse Counseling Goals and Intervention Strategies assessment
Counseling Goals and Intervention Strategies
8 points
Criteria Description
Counseling Goals and Intervention Strategies
5. Excellent
8 points
Discussion of the counseling goals and intervention strategies is thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported.Counseling goals and intervention strategies demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
4. Good
6.96 points
Discussion of the counseling goals and intervention strategies is thorough and well-reasoned.Counseling goals and intervention strategies demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.
3. Satisfactory
6.32 points
Discussion of the counseling goals and intervention strategies is accurate and complete.Counseling goals and intervention strategies demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
5.92 points
Discussion of the results of the counseling goals and intervention strategies is incomplete or flawed.Counseling goals and intervention strategies demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of the counseling goals and intervention strategies is not present or not discernible to the reader.Counseling goals and intervention strategies does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
collapse Short- or Long-Term Counseling assessment
Short- or Long-Term Counseling
8 points
Criteria Description
Short- or Long-Term Counseling
5. Excellent
8 points
Discussion of whether the theory is designed for short- or long-term counseling is thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported.Explanation of short- or long-term counseling demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
4. Good
6.96 points
Discussion of whether the theory is designed for short- or long-term counseling is thorough and well-reasoned.Explanation of short- or long-term counseling demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.
3. Satisfactory
6.32 points
Discussion of whether the theory is designed for short- or long-term counseling is accurate and complete.Explanation of short- or long-term counseling demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
5.92 points
Discussion of whether the theory is designed for short- or long-term counseling is incomplete or flawed.Explanation of short- or long-term counseling demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of whether the theory is designed for short- or long-term counseling is not present or not discernible to the reader.Explanation of short- or long-term counseling does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
collapse Counselor’s Role with the Client assessment
Counselor’s Role with the Client
8 points
Criteria Description
Counselor’s Role with the Client
5. Excellent
8 points
Discussion of the counselor’s role with the client is thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported.Discussion of the counselor’s role with the client demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
4. Good
6.96 points
Discussion of the counselor’s role with the client is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of the counselor’s role with the client demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.
3. Satisfactory
6.32 points
Discussion of the counselor’s role with the client is accurate and complete.Discussion of the counselor’s role with the client demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
5.92 points
Discussion of the counselor’s role with the client is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of the counselor’s role with the client demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of the counselor’s role with the client is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of the counselor’s role with the client does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
collapse Client’s Role in Counseling assessment
Client’s Role in Counseling
8 points
Criteria Description
Client’s Role in Counseling
5. Excellent
8 points
Discussion of the client’s role in counseling is thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported.Discussion of the client’s role in counseling demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
4. Good
6.96 points
Discussion of the client’s role in counseling is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of the client’s role in counseling demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.
3. Satisfactory
6.32 points
Discussion of the client’s role in counseling is accurate and complete.Discussion of the client’s role in counseling demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
5.92 points
Discussion of the client’s role in counseling is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of the client’s role in counseling demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of the client’s role in counseling is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of the client’s role in counseling does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
collapse Population and Social and Cultural Needs of Client assessment
Population and Social and Cultural Needs of Client
8 points
Criteria Description
Population and Social and Cultural Needs of Client
5. Excellent
8 points
Discussion of the population and social and cultural needs of the client is thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported.Discussion of the population demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
4. Good
6.96 points
Discussion of the population and social and cultural needs of the client is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of the population demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.
3. Satisfactory
6.32 points
Discussion of the population and social and cultural needs of the client is accurate and complete.Discussion of the population demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
5.92 points
Discussion of the population and social and cultural needs of the client is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of the population demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of the population and social and cultural needs of the client is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of the population does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
collapse Helpful Additional Information assessment
Helpful Additional Information
4 points
Criteria Description
Helpful Additional Information
5. Excellent
4 points
Discussion of any helpful additional information is thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported.Discussion of any helpful additional information demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
4. Good
3.48 points
Discussion of any helpful additional information is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of any helpful additional information demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.
3. Satisfactory
3.16 points
Discussion of any helpful additional information is accurate and complete.Discussion of any helpful additional information demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
2.96 points
Discussion of any helpful additional information is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of any helpful additional information demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of any helpful additional information is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of any helpful additional information does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
collapse Risk assessment
Risk
4 points
Criteria Description
Risk
5. Excellent
4 points
Discussion of the potential risks is thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported.Discussion of the potential risks demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
4. Good
3.48 points
Discussion of the potential risks is thorough and well-reasoned.Discussion of the potential risks demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.
3. Satisfactory
3.16 points
Discussion of the potential risks is accurate and complete.Discussion of the potential risks demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
2.96 points
Discussion of the potential risks is incomplete or flawed.Discussion of the potential risks demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of the potential risks is not present or not discernible to the reader.Discussion of the potential risks does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
collapse Thesis Development and Purpose assessment
Thesis Development and Purpose
5.6 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. Excellent
5.6 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. Good
4.87 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. Satisfactory
4.42 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
4.14 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
collapse Argument Logic and Construction assessment
Argument Logic and Construction
6.4 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. Excellent
6.4 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. Good
5.57 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. Satisfactory
5.06 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
4.74 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
collapse Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) assessment
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
4 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. Excellent
4 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Good
3.48 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. Satisfactory
3.16 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
2.96 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
collapse Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) assessment
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
4 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. Excellent
4 points
All format elements are correct.
4. Good
3.48 points
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. Satisfactory
3.16 points
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
2.96 points
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
collapse Documentation of Sources assessment
Documentation of Sources
4 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Excellent
4 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. Good
3.48 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. Satisfactory
3.16 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
2.96 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
ssessment Description
Read the “Case Study Analysis.”
Select one of the following theories that you feel best applies to treating the client in the case study:
Bowen Family Systems
Structural
Strategic
Write a 750-1,000-word analysis of the case study using the theory you chose. Include the following in your analysis.
What concepts of the theory make it the most appropriate for the client in the case study?
Why did you choose this theory over the others?
What will be the goals of counseling and what intervention strategies are used to accomplish those goals?
Is the theory designed for short- or long-term counseling?
What will be the counselor’s role with this client?
What is the client’s role in counseling?
For what population(s) is this theory most appropriate? How does this theory address the social and cultural needs of the client?
What additional information might be helpful to know about this case?
What may be a risk in using this approach?
Include at least three scholarly references outside of the course textbook in your paper.
Each response to the assignment prompts should be addressed under a separate heading in your paper. Refer to “APA Headings and Seriation,” located on the Purdue Owl website for help in formatting the headings.