Assignent Solutionnurs

Complete Writing Assignment#1-Paper#1, Psychology and the Law Paper For this paper respond to and address each and all of the following questions below: As stated in the syllabus and Obojobo modules on Avoiding Plagiarism, responses which do not contain BOTH in-text citation and references, using the appropriate level of citation will be flagged for plagiarism and receive a zero. In your response you must address all of the following criteria: Comparing the Law and Psychology: (this criterion should take approximately 1-2 paragraphs to address) Discuss and explain the 4 primary “conflicts” or differences between psychology’s approach and the law’s approach to human behavior. Use information for Chapter 1 (Huss) and information discussed in the unit module introduction to content to support your response. Do not just copy from the textbook or assigned readings. You are being asked to explain and discuss this information. Thus, you need to use your critical thinking skills and logic to make connections, compare, and contrast your own experiences and knowledge with the ideas/research discussed in the assigned readings. Psychology & the Law in Action (this criterion should take approximately 1-2 paragraphs to address) How does the Judas Priest case, discussed in Chapter 9 of Minds on Trial, demonstrate how psychology influences law? Provide specific examples from the case to support your conclusions. This means you must clearly discuss and explain psychological and legal elements of the case. Do not just restate the facts of the case. Clearly identify and label any psychological concepts which were prominent and identify and discuss the specific legal issue in question. Intersection Opinion (this criterion should take approximately 1-2 paragraphs to address) Briefly, in your opinion, why do people find the intersection of psychology and the law so fascinating? Read the Introduction to the Minds on Trial book for hints/suggestion. You must support your overall discussion in this assignment with information, definitions, and research provided in the module pages, the Minds on Trial and Huss (2013) texts, as requested in each of the above prompts. Do not just copy from the textbook or assigned readings. You are being asked to explain and discuss this information. Thus, you need to use your critical thinking skills and logic to make connections, compare, and contrast your own experiences and knowledge with the ideas/research discussed in the assigned readings. Additional Paper Requirements: APA style in-text citation and reference is required. Students may not use websites, of any kind, as a primary source in their responses. Submissions which do not contain both APA style in-text citation and reference, using the appropriate level of citation, and/or which use websites of any kind as a primary source may receive a zero. Submissions with a TurnItIn score greater than 25% may be flagged for possible plagiarism. Papers formatting must be: A minimum of 2 FULL pages, single-spaced, 12-point New Times Roman font or similar. Do not exceed 3 pages. Reference citations included on a separate page do not count towards writing minimum or maximum. Do not use any titles, title pages, or headings, course name or date, etc. If you include your name or PID it should be included in the “header” of the document and not part of the main content. Do not use bullet points, outlines, or numbering in your response. Essay/paragraph format is required. APA style in-text citation and reference is required. Appropriate level of citation is REQUIRED. Students may not use websites, of any kind, as a primary source in their responses. Submissions which do not contain both APA style in-text citation and reference and/or which use websites of any kind as a primary source may receive a zero. Assignment responses which do not fulfill all of the above criteria will receive point deductions