Assignent Solutionnurs

Assignment 4: Literature review CHCPOL003 Research and apply evidence to practice Due Apr 17 by 11:59pm Word count: 1000 words Task overview – Research a topic of interest from one situation or issue from clinical placement, or an area of interest you would like to research further, and decide on two articles you would like to review. You will write a literature review based on the two articles you select. Instructions Part 1 – Thinking about your learning in the Diploma of Nursing, choose one situation or issue from clinical placement or an area of interest you would like to research further. Source two recent research articles that meet all of the following criteria: • are both on the same subject matter (your topic) • are both from well known, reputable journals (no websites or blogs accepted—use the Swinburne Library databases) • have both been written within the last five to seven years • are of interest to you and are nursing related. Part 2 Prepare to write your literature review by critiquing the two journal articles you have selected. As part of the critique, consider the following questions: • What was the research hypothesis of the study you are reviewing? • What were the authors trying to discover? • Was the research funded by a source that could influence the findings? • What were the research methodologies? • Are the samples and variables used appropriate? • Does the research seem to be complete? • Could it have been conducted more soundly? • What further questions does it raise? • If there are conflicting studies, why do you think that is? Part 3 – Write your literature review, which is an essay that surveys, summarises, links together, and assesses the research in a given field as presented through the articles you have critiqued. Your literature review should have the following major sections: • Introduction: clearly shows the topic, the relevance of researchers’ arguments and theories, and why you have included or excluded them. • Methodology: an overview of how the research was conducted, terms used to conduct your search, number and types of articles. . database search engine and filters you used to find your articles. • Findings: a summary of the major findings in your chosen area of interest. • Discussion: shows how your arguments relate to, support or oppose what others have written. • Conclusion: summarises the overall themes of the research with a focus on the major conclusions, problems in the research and even possible avenues of further research. No new information should be included here. • Reference list: Note that referencing for the literature review should meet APA 7th referencing style (in-text references and reference list). Assignment 4 marking guide Criteria Not Competent Pass Competent (5) Excellent (10) Introduction Research hypothesis is not identifiable. Main discussion points are not outlined. Research hypothesis could be stated more clearly. Main discussion points could be more clearly outlined. Clear research hypothesis. Discussion points for the literature review are clearly identified. Method Details about how the research was conducted, selection process, search terms used and types of articles are not included. Details about how the research was conducted, selection process, search terms and types of articles is unclear. Clear details about how the research was conducted and the selection process, search terms used, types of articles. Findings and discussion Comparison and contrast of findings is limited or not evident. Discussion of findings does not clearly link to hypothesis or main points. Discussion about the limitations, gaps and inconsistencies is not present. Comparison and contrast of findings are provided but are not thorough. Discussion of findings could relate better to the hypothesis and main points. Limitations, gaps and inconsistencies are briefly referred to, and could be expanded on. Thorough comparison and contrast of findings are provided and relate to the hypothesis and main discussion points. A focus on research findings is very clear. Limitation, gaps and inconsistencies from the literature are clearly discussed. Conclusion Summary of the main discussion points is not clearly presented. Implications for nursing practice are absent, illogical, irrelevant or unclear. Summary of the main points are included but not clear. Implications for nursing practice are included but lack logic, relevance or clarity. A summary of the main points are clearly articulated. Implications for nursing practice are logical, relevant and clear. Grammar/spelling Multiple errors in sentence structure are evident. Spelling and punctuation errors are common. First person pronouns (. I, my) are frequently used and reporting verbs are lacking. Sentence structure and use of paragraphs could be improved. Some spelling and punctuation errors are present. Some first person pronouns are used . I, my. Use of reporting verbs could increase. Appropriate sentence structure is used, paragraphs are evident. Punctuation and spelling is correct. Good use of third person language and reporting verbs . ‘This research identifies…’;’the authors describe…’ References Multiple errors in using APA style. Several ideas, theories or points are not supported with an in-text reference. Shows a mostly accurate understanding of APA style. Minor in-text or reference list errors. Mostly matches an in-text reference to an idea, theory or point. Excellent use of APA style for in-text references and reference list. In-text references clearly match to an idea, theory or point. CHCPOL003 Research and apply evidence to practice Assignment 4: Literature review Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction 10 pts Full Marks Clear research hypothesis. Discussion points for the literature review are clearly identified. 5 pts Partial Marks Research hypothesis could be stated more clearly. Main discussion points could be more clearly outlined. 0 pts No Marks Research hypothesis is not identifiable. Main discussion points are not outlined. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Method 10 pts Full Marks Clear details about how the research was conducted and the selection process, search terms used, types of articles. 5 pts Partial Marks Details about how the research was conducted, selection process, search terms and types of articles is unclear.. 0 pts No Marks Details about how the research was conducted, selection process, search terms used and types of articles are not included. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Findings and discussion 10 pts Full Marks Thorough comparison and contrast of findings are provided and relate to the hypothesis and main discussion points. A focus on research findings is very clear. Limitation, gaps and inconsistencies from the literature are clearly discussed. 5 pts Partial Marks Comparison and contrast of findings are provided but are not thorough. Discussion of findings could relate better to the hypothesis and main points. Limitations, gaps and inconsistencies are briefly referred to, and could be expanded on. 0 pts No Marks Comparison and contrast of findings is limited or not evident. Discussion of findings does not clearly link to hypothesis or main points. Discussion about the limitations, gaps and inconsistencies is not present. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion 10 pts Full Marks A summary of the main points are clearly articulated. Implications for nursing practice are logical, relevant and clear. 5 pts Partial Marks Summary of the main points are included but not clear. Implications for nursing practice are included but lack logic, relevance or clarity. 0 pts No Marks Summary of the main discussion points is not clearly presented. Implications for nursing practice are absent, illogical, irrelevant or unclear. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar/spelling 10 pts Full Marks Appropriate sentence structure is used, paragraphs are evident. Punctuation and spelling is correct. Good use of third person language and reporting verbs . ‘This research identifies…’;’the authors describe…’ 5 pts Partial Marks Sentence structure and use of paragraphs could be improved. Some spelling and punctuation errors are present. Some first person pronouns are used . I, my. Use of reporting verbs could increase. 0 pts No Marks Multiple errors in sentence structure are evident. Spelling and punctuation errors are common. First person pronouns (. I, my) are frequently used and reporting verbs are lacking. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome References 10 pts Full Marks Excellent use of APA style for in-text references and reference list. In-text references clearly match to an idea, theory or point. 5 pts Partial Marks Shows a mostly accurate understanding of APA style. Minor in-text or reference list errors. Mostly matches an in-text reference to an idea, theory or point. 0 pts No Marks Multiple errors in using APA style. Several ideas, theories or points are not supported with an in-text reference. 10 pts Total Points: 60 Below are the two articles for review. Ass 4 Lit review CHCPOL003 research and apply evidence to practise. I am happy for you to choose others, but would like the subject to be about malutrtion in the elderly please.