Assignent Solutionnurs

1-2 Reflection Journal: Social Determinants
Listen
ReadSpeaker webReader: Listen
Focus
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin®
Turnitin® enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.
Instructions
Consider the relationship between public health and the social determinants of health. Some people view public health theory and the social determinants of health as two discrete concepts. Others look for causation: Do the social determinants shape population health or does population health create social determinants? How might competing views influence research, funding, policy decisions?
For this journal submission, consider a variety of public health interventions intended to improve population health. Which interventions considered social determinants to successfully improve population health? In contrast, which interventions failed to consider social determinants? Describe some outcomes and opportunities for improvement.
Next, review the connection between public health and public policy. Discuss how the outcomes of successful and unsuccessful public health interventions have shaped public policy. Be sure to reference specific examples to support your conclusions.
Finally, include a personal reflection and make connections to your own experiences as noted in the rubric.
For additional details, please refer to the Reflection Journal Guidelines and Rubric PDF document.
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Reflection Journal Rubric
Print Rubric
Criteria
Exemplary
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Criterion Score
Application of Concepts
20 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and cites samples that are relevant and supported by scholarly research
18 points
Applies elements of health policy and management studied to questions posed in prompt using specific details
14 points
Applies elements of health policy and management studied to questions posed in prompt, but lacks details
0 points
Does not apply elements of health policy and management studied
Score of Application of Concepts, / 20
Personal Reflection
70 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and uses specific relevant examples to support connections
63 points
Includes a clear and relevant personal reflection and makes connections to own experiences in relation to elements of health policy and management
49 points
Includes a personal reflection, but connections are not clear or lack details
0 points
Does not include a personal reflection
Score of Personal Reflection, / 70
Articulation of Response
10 points
Journal is free of errors in organization and grammar
9 points
Journal is mostly free of errors of organization and grammar; errors are marginal and rarely interrupt the flow
7 points
Journal contains errors of organization and grammar, but errors are limited enough so that journal can be understood
0 points
Journal contains errors of organization and grammar making the journal difficult to understand
Score of Articulation of Response, / 10
Total
Score of Reflection Journal Rubric, / 100
Overall Score
Points earned out of 100
91 points minimum
The overall submission earned 91 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
71 points minimum
The overall submission earned 71 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
1 point minimum
The overall submission earned 1 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
0 points minimum
The overall submission earned 0 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.