Assignent Solutionnurs

7-1 Journal: Evaluating Environmental Health Programs
Listen
ReadSpeaker webReader: Listen
Focus
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin®
Turnitin® enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.
Instructions
Foundational Competencies
Upon successful completion of this journal assignment, you will be able to:
Select methods to evaluate public health programs
Foundational Public Health Knowledge
Upon successful completion of this journal assignment, you will be able to:
Explain the social, political, and economic determinants of health and how they contribute to population health and health inequities
Key Resources
PDF Manual: Introduction to Program Evaluation for Public Health Programs: A Self-Study Guide
Website: Step 4—Gather Credible Evidence
PDF Document: Types of Evaluation
Prompt
For this assignment, you will continue your analysis started in the Module Six Journal. The focus of this journal will be on the methods used to evaluate the policy, program, project, or intervention selected during Module Six. You will now select the evaluation methods for this public health program. Please review the CDC’s program evaluation framework (resources provided above) before proceeding.
Please complete Part 4 of the Intervention Planning Worksheet. Be sure to read the “Types of Evaluation” provided resource for guidance and definitions of terms used in the worksheet.
Guidelines for Submission:
Submit worksheet (all parts) for grading. Please note: Although you are asked to submit all parts of the worksheet, only Part 4 will be reviewed for grading.
Please review the Module Seven Journal Guidelines and Rubric PDF document for grading details.
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Module Seven Journal Rubric
Print Rubric
This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.
Criteria
Exemplary
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Criterion Score
Process Evaluation
25 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates keen insight into indicators, data sources, instruments, methods, the quality of the measurement, and the rationale for selecting evaluation methodologies
22.5 points
Identifies at least one appropriate indicator for each objective and describes how they will be measured (data sources, instruments, methods); the quality of the measurement; and the rationale for selecting evaluation methodologies
17.5 points
Identifies at least one indicator for each objective and describes how they will be measured (data sources, instruments, methods); the quality of the measurement; and the rationale for selecting evaluation methodologies; but responses are cursory or contain inaccuracies
0 points
Does not identify at least one indicator for each objective and describe how they will be measured (data sources, instruments, methods); the quality of the measurement; and the rationale for selecting evaluation methodologies
Score of Process Evaluation, / 25
Outcome Evaluation
25 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates keen insight into indicators, data sources, instruments, methods, the quality of the measurement, and the rationale for selecting evaluation methodologies
22.5 points
Identifies at least one appropriate indicator for each objective and describes how they will be measured (data sources, instruments, methods); the quality of the measurement; and the rationale for selecting evaluation methodologies
17.5 points
Identifies at least one indicator for each objective and describes how they will be measured (data sources, instruments, methods); the quality of the measurement; and the rationale for selecting evaluation methodologies; but responses are cursory or contain inaccuracies
0 points
Does not identify at least one indicator for each objective and describe how they will be measured (data sources, instruments, methods); the quality of the measurement; and the rationale for selecting evaluation methodologies
Score of Outcome Evaluation, / 25
Impact Evaluation
25 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates keen insight into indicators, data sources, instruments, methods, the quality of the measurement, and the rationale for selecting evaluation methodologies
22.5 points
Identifies at least one appropriate indicator for each objective and describes how they will be measured (data sources, instruments, methods); the quality of the measurement; and the rationale for selecting evaluation methodologies
17.5 points
Identifies at least one indicator for each objective and describes how they will be measured (data sources, instruments, methods); the quality of the measurement; and the rationale for selecting evaluation methodologies; but responses are cursory or contain inaccuracies
0 points
Does not identify at least one indicator for each objective and describe how they will be measured (data sources, instruments, methods); the quality of the measurement; and the rationale for selecting evaluation methodologies
Score of Impact Evaluation, / 25
Formative Evaluation
25 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates keen insight into indicators, data sources, instruments, methods, the quality of the measurement, and the rationale for selecting evaluation methodologies
22.5 points
Identifies at least one appropriate indicator for each objective and describes how they will be measured (data sources, instruments, methods); the quality of the measurement; and the rationale for selecting evaluation methodologies
17.5 points
Identifies at least one indicator for each objective and describes how they will be measured (data sources, instruments, methods); the quality of the measurement; and the rationale for selecting evaluation methodologies; but responses are cursory or contain inaccuracies
0 points
Does not identify at least one indicator for each objective and describe how they will be measured (data sources, instruments, methods); the quality of the measurement; and the rationale for selecting evaluation methodologies
Score of Formative Evaluation, / 25
Rubric Total Score
Total
Score of Module Seven Journal Rubric, / 100 Criterion score has been overridden
Overall Score
Overall Score
Points earned out of 100
91 points minimum
The overall submission earned 91 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
71 points minimum
The overall submission earned 71 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
1 point minimum
The overall submission earned 1 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
0 points minimum
The overall submission earned 0 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.