Assignent Solutionnurs

Issue is increased number of hospital acquired pressure injuries. My role is a head nurse and patient advocate *Download the EBP Change Process form Links to an external site.during Week 1. The use of this specific form is REQUIRED Use the instructor feedback from the Week 2 Check-In (clinical topic and PICOT) as the foundation for developing your change process.
Locate a systematic review on your topic from the Chamberlain Library. Be sure this involves nursing actions.
Work through each step of the ACE Star Model as outlined on the assignment form (Star Points 1-5: Discovery, Summary, Translation, Implementation, and Evaluation). Respond to the instructions provided on the form.
Follow the activities and thinking of Nurse Daniel in Weeks 1-6 in the ‘Illustration’ part of each lesson. He will be working through a clinical topic and nursing practice issue to demonstrate a change (ACE Star Model and systematic review).
Work on a portion of the process each week, as the illustration unfolds.
*Week 6: EBP Change Process Assignment Grading Rubric
Week 6: EBP Change Process Assignment Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelected Systematic Review
A systematic review from the Chamberlain Library databases was selected, identified, and was appropriate for the selected nursing change process.
25 pts
One systematic review from the Chamberlain Library databases was identified and was clearly appropriate.
22 pts
A systematic review was selected from the Chamberlain Library databases and was mostly appropriate for a nursing change process.
20 pts
A systematic review was selected from the Chamberlain Library databases and was fairly appropriate for a nursing change process.
10 pts
A systematic review was selected, but not from the Chamberlain Library databases and/or was not appropriate for this assignment.
0 pts
No systematic review selected or used.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 1 (Discovery)
The topic, nursing practice issue, rationale and scope of the problem were clearly identified and described.
25 pts
Star Point 1 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed.
22 pts
Star Point 1 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed.
20 pts
Star Point 1 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail.
10 pts
Star Point 1 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail.
0 pts
The ACE Star Model Star Point 1 was not completed.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 2 (Summary)
The Nursing practice issue, Nursing-related PICOT question, a systematic review from any database in the Chamberlain Library, and other optional references, evidence summary, strength, and solutions, are listed and described.
35 pts
Star Point 2 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed.
31 pts
Star Point 2 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed.
28 pts
Star Point 2 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail.
13 pts
Star Point 2 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail. or were inappropriate.
0 pts
The ACE Star Model Star Point 2 was not completed.
35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 3 (Translation)
Care standards, practice guidelines, or protocols; stakeholders and their roles and responsibilities; the nursing role; rationale for including certain stakeholders, and cost analysis plan are addressed.
35 pts
Star Point 3 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed.
31 pts
Star Point 3 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed.
28 pts
Star Point 3. was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail.
13 pts
Star Point 3 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail.
0 pts
The ACE Star Model Star Point 3 was not completed.
35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 4 (Implementation)
Permission process, education plan, timeline, measurable outcomes, forms, resources, and stakeholder meetings, are addressed.
35 pts
Star Point 4 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed.
31 pts
Star Point 4 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed
28 pts
Star Point 4 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail.
13 pts
Star Point 4 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail.
0 pts
The ACE Star Model Star Point 4 was not completed.
35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 5 (Evaluation)
Reporting results, process and next steps are addressed.
35 pts
Star Point 5 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed.
31 pts
Star Point 5 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed
28 pts
Star Point 5 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail.
13 pts
Star Point 5 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail.
0 pts
The ACE Star Model Star Point 5 was not completed.
35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation
Information was presented clearly and thoughts were well organized and logical.
20 pts
Information was presented clearly and thoughts were well organized and logical throughout.
18 pts
Information was presented clearly and thoughts were mainly organized and logical throughout.
16 pts
Information was presented clearly and thoughts were somewhat organized and logical throughout.
8 pts
Information was not consistently clear and/or was not consistently organized and logical.
0 pts
Information was disorganized and difficult to understand.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics/APA
The systematic review and any other scholarly resources were properly listed in APA format.
The writing includes error free grammar and spelling, and complete sentence structure.
15 pts
Excellent mechanics and APA formatting with minimal errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.
13 pts
Good mechanics and formatting considering the elements listed in the first column
12 pts
Fair mechanics and formatting considering the elements listed in the first column
6 pts
Poor mechanics and formatting considering the elements listed in the first column
0 pts
Very poor mechanics and formatting such that information is difficult to read.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Form Used
0 pts
0 points deducted
Correct assignment form used
0 pts
22.5 points (10%) deducted
Incorrect form used resulting in point deduction
0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction
0 pts
0 points deducted
Submitted on time
0 pts
Not submitted on time – Point deduction
1 day late =11.25 deduction; 2 days=22.5 deduction; 3 days=33.75 deduction; 4 days =45 deduction; 5 days = 56.25 deduction; 6 days =67.5 deduction; 7 days =78.75 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late
0 pts
Total Points: 225