Assignent Solutionnurs

Program improvement refers to evaluating whether a program or policy was delivered as intended. Program staff and policy makers often need to know whether program activities are aligned with the plan. Imagine working on a program or instituting a policy for 3 years only to discover that one major component was never provided to clients. Unfortunately, uncovering errors too late occurs much too often. Program improvement is important during the implementation phase of program. The consequences of failing to catch potential problems during the implementation of a program can have dire consequences. A funding agency that learns a program has been botched may lose faith in the credibility of the program staff and terminate funding. There is also an important ethical component to program improvement. The failure to check on an ongoing basis whether the program continues to “do good” (beneficence) and minimize harm (nonmaleficence) to program participants could result in the program being terminated for failure to adhere to ethical standards. Program improvement is essential because if, for some reason, the program could not be delivered in its entirety according to plan, then the likelihood that it will be effective (i.e., have its intended impact on participants) is diminished.
In this second part of the Scholar Practitioner Project (SPP), you will design an evaluation project to address a public health issue. Specifically, you will design a Program Improvement (PI) evaluation project for your public health program (described in SPP Part 1) by using mixed methods.
Review the module Learning Resources.
Continuing with the same evidence-based public health program, consider how you might design a PI evaluation project for this program using mixed methods data.
Review evaluation methods associated with a PI evaluation project.
Download the SPP Part 2 Template to complete your PI evaluation project.
Note: Use the SPP Part 2 Template to complete your PI evaluation project.In a 1-page paper (not including title page and references):Design a PI evaluation project for your evidence-based public health program using mixed methods. Describe the data collection plan by completing Table 1 Summary: Evaluation of Program Improvement with the following information:Identify quantitative program improvement indicators.
Identify qualitative program improvement indicators.
Explain the data collection methods (evaluation methods) used and justify their selection. Data collection methods must be aligned to a specific indicator.
Support your statements/arguments with evidence:References: Support your work with at least one peer-reviewed article, less than 5 years old. Properly cite/reference using APA 7th edition.
Rural Health Information Hub. (n.d.). Module 4: Evaluation tools for rural health promotion and disease prevention programs, https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/toolkits/health-pr… The University of Kansas Community Tool Box. (n.d.). Chapter 36 Introduction to evaluation: Section 1. A framework for program evaluation: A gateway to tools, https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/evaluate/e… Oversight and Compliance (O&C)The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2018–2019). Annual performance report: Instruction manual for grantees of the children’s hospitals graduate medical education, https://www.hhs.gov/guidance/sites/default/files/h… The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2018–2019). Annual performance report: Instruction manual for grantees of the public health training centers, https://www.hhs.gov/guidance/sites/default/files/h… Program Improvement (PI)Coşkun , R., Akande, A., & Renger, R. (2012). Using root cause analysis for evaluating program improvement, Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 12(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1035719X1201200202