Assignent Solutionnurs

Introduction: The purpose of this assignment is to discuss the implications of a health policy solution to address mental health on college campuses and relate it to the larger social and healthcare system structure. Be sure to address all aspects of the assignment as described below and follow formatting and submission guidelines. Conceptual Steps: Start by reading the Campuses Debate Rising Demands for ‘Comfort Animals’ article. The article discusses the policy solution of allowing Emotional Support Animals in campus housing to address mental health issues on college campuses. Article (link): https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/05/us/four-legged-roommates-help-with-the-stresses-of-campus-life.html?module=inline (Links to an external site.) Article (pdf if link above does not work): Campuses Debate Rising Demands for ‘Comfort Animals’ – The New York Times.pdf Download Campuses Debate Rising Demands for ‘Comfort Animals’ – The New York Times.pdf In-text Citation: (Hoffman, 2015) Reference: Hoffman, J. (2015, Oct. 5). Campuses Debate Rising Demand for ‘Comfort Animals’.(National Desk). The New York Times. p. A1. If necessary, briefly research the issue of Emotional Support Animals. It’s helpful to give yourself a better understanding, particularly of what an Emotional Support Animal is and is not, as well as other facts and viewpoints that may not be in the article provided. Consider the issue: Should Emotional Support Animals Be Permitted on College Campuses? Make sure you could briefly explain it to someone else. What are some questions raised about the differences between how things are (the status quo), and how things could be or should be. “How things are” is about facts, while “how things could or should be” is about values (. moral judgements). What questions could someone ask about how you get from facts to value judgements? Then pick a position (Pro- yes they should; Con- no they should not). Remember that your position does not necessarily need to reflect your personal opinion on the issue (and can be a much better learning experience when it does not). Identify two arguments that support your position on the issue of Emotional Support Animals on college campuses. These MUST be arguments that are supported by evidence (., from the NYT article and your other sources, if you have them). Identify two arguments that oppose your position on the issue of Emotional Support Animals on college campuses. These MUST be arguments that are supported by evidence (., from the NYT article and your other sources, if you have them). Think about your arguments and the basic ethical dilemma. Remember that a dilemma occurs when there are two or more opposing choices. Where/how does that occur in this issue? What are some ethical principles that relate to those issues (consider which ethical principles relate to each argument)? You MUST use the bioethical principles given to you in the course material and cite these sources. Reflect on how people from different socioeconomic status might view this issue. In other words, how might individuals of different socioeconomic status view the issue of emotional support animals on campus? Would they look at it the same way, or differently? How so? How do these perspectives relate to the arguments given in the previous paragraph? Writing outline: Paragraph 1: Provide a clear introductory statement, including your position on the issue. Your introductory statement should be 1-2 sentences describing the problem, as well as a clear statement of your position. PRO: Emotional Support Animals should be allowed in campus housing CON: Emotional Support Animals should not be allowed in campus housing. Paragraph 2: Present at least two arguments supporting your position on the issue. You MUST use the given article, but are permitted to use additional sources if you wish. Paragraph 3: Present at least two arguments opposing your position on the issue. You MUST use the given article, but are permitted to use additional sources if you wish. Paragraph 4: Identify and briefly discuss the underlying ethical dilemma in this issue (the arguments for and against you gave above)- be sure to use the specific ethical principles used in this course. Paragraph 5: Identify and discuss the different perspectives that might be taken by individuals based on socioeconomic status. How do these perspectives relate to the arguments given in paragraphs 2 and 3? Formatting Outline: Be sure that you clearly address each point above and elaborate on your answers. Your write-up should be at least pages, but no more than 3 pages, using the following formatting guidelines: 1″margins, double-spaced, 12pt Times New Roman font. Please be sure to complete this assignment in paragraph form and use proper spelling and grammar. Be sure your assignment is submitted as a Word document (.doc or .docx) or other compatible format (.rtf). Assignments submitted in other formats will be given a grade of zero. This assignment is due before Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 11:59pm Assignments must be submitted through Canvas, prior to the due date and time. Please be sure you confirm your submission. Emailed submissions will not be read or graded. Grading Guide: Paragraph 1: Introductory Statement Clear introductory statement. Briefly summarizes issue and clearly states Pro or Con position. Maximum mark: 4 Paragraph 2: Arguments Supporting Position Two separate arguments from supporting position clearly identified. Arguments are from article and use supporting evidence from article. Maximum mark: 6 Paragraph 3: Arguments Opposing Position Two separate arguments from opposing position clearly identified. Arguments are from article and use supporting evidence from article. Maximum mark: 6 Paragraph 4: Ethical Issue Ethical dilemma identified and described, using ethical principles from course materials. Maximum mark: 5 Paragraph 5: Differing Perspectives Identification and description of how differing socioeconomic perspectives may view the issue, including assessment of how arguments from paragraph 2 relate to perspectives. Maximum mark: 5 Formatting A minimum of pages in length, maximum of 3 pages, 1” margins, double-spaced, 12 pt. Times New Roman font and is free of spelling/grammatical errors. Maximum mark: 4 This assignment requires you to use specific examples from the New York Times article. As such, you must also cite the information in the text and provide a reference at the end of the paper. The correct APA formatted Reference and In-Text Citation for the article are found above. You MUST use these. If you choose to use additional sources, they must be cited AND referenced as well. All outside information (including course materials) must be cited correctly using APA formatting (in-text citations and reference list). To not include citations AND references for ALL outside information constitutes plagiarism and is a violation of the Academic Integrity Policy and will result in a grade of zero for the assignment and possible disciplinary action. If you are unsure how to cite information correctly, it is your responsibility to figure out how to do it correctly (., consult your instructor, TA, the library, Purdue OWL website, etc.) Rubric Module 2 Assignment F2021 Module 2 Assignment F2021 Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParagraph 1: Clear introductory statement. Briefly summarizes issue and clearly states Pro or Con position. 4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParagraph 2: Two separate arguments from supporting position clearly identified. Arguments are from article and use supporting evidence from article. 6 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParagraph 3: Two separate arguments from opposing position clearly identified. Arguments are from article and use supporting evidence from article. 6 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParagraph 4: Ethical dilemma identified and described, using ethical principles from course materials. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParagraph 5: Identification and description of how differing socioeconomic perspectives may view the issue, including assessment of how arguments from paragraph 2 relate to perspectives. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting A minimum of pages in length, maximum of 3 pages, 1” margins, double-spaced, 12 pt. Times New Roman font and is free of spelling/grammatical errors. 4 pts Total Points: 30