Assignent Solutionnurs

In a brief paper (200 words minimum) identify: At least two-evidence based scientific studies that support the use of the intervention or assessment instrument you will be highlighting in your final program evaluation design (Module 15) Discuss the strength of the support found in the studies in research language. For instance, with an assessment instrument you need to discuss its content, a number of items, subscales, how it has been used as well as its Cronbach’s alpha and the type of studies and findings that indicate the instrument is valid. With an intervention, you will be concerned with any studies that show or suggest in a clinical trial or well-conducted experiment, that the effect sizes are moderate to strong–that those who received the intervention have a stronger benefit than those who received an alternate intervention or none at all. Include full APA citations on both of your articles. These articles cannot be the same articles utilized in the Critical Analysis assignment but could come from their references or from looking up authors who have cited the former articles using Web of Science. No lengthy quotations. Grading Guidelines This assignment is worth 75 points toward your overall grade and will be graded based on the guidelines below: Both articles have to come from professional peer-reviewed journal articles. No websites. References in APA 7th format. Instrument Focus Must contain: 1) specific and adequate information about reliability and validity; 2) description of its structure: # of items, and subscales, how scored; 3) how it has been used, with what populations, etc. (could come from a survey of citations in Web of Science); 4) any possible challenges to its use? 5) Must contain an adequate summary highlighting the benefits of adopting the instrument and any possible limitations. Attach a reference list. Each section is worth 15 points. Three points subtracted if not APA format; 7 points subtracted for poor grammar, lack of proofreading, or poor quality of the written communication. Intervention Focus: Must provide: 1) credible evidence that the intervention makes a difference; 2) systematic review or meta-analysis found and reviewed? If not, discuss the number of studies in Web of Science specific to your proposed use of the intervention and how you searched; 3) make an argument that the proposed intervention is more powerful than an alternative treatment or a no-treatment control group; 4) any possible challenges to its use? 5) Must contain an adequate summary highlighting the benefits of adopting the intervention. Each section is worth 15 points. Attach a reference list. Three points subtracted if not APA format; 7 points subtracted for poor grammar, lack of proofreading, or poor quality of the written communication.