Assignent Solutionnurs

4-1 Short Paper: Human Capital
Listen
ReadSpeaker webReader: Listen
Focus
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin®
Turnitin® enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.
Instructions
Submit your short paper here.
For additional details, please refer to the Module Four Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric PDF document.
To complete this short paper use the Policymaking Process Worksheet Word Document.
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Module Four Short Paper Rubric
Print Rubric
Criteria
Exemplary
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Criterion Score
Key Factors/Impact: Force Field Analysis
9.5 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and assessment is substantiated by research
8.55 points
Identifies key forces that impact policymaking and classifies these forces as driving or restraining forces
6.65 points
Identifies forces that impact policymaking, but identification is incomplete or contains inaccuracies, or forces are incorrectly classified as driving or restraining
0 points
Does not provide an assessment of how key factors in public health change over time or how this impacts the public health workforce
Score of Key Factors/Impact: Force Field Analysis, / 9.5
Key Factors/Impact: Influencing Policy
9.5 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and methods are conclusive and detailed
8.55 points
Describes methods that may be used by public health professionals to influence policy
6.65 points
Describes methods that may be used by public health professionals to influence policy, but description is incomplete or contains inaccuracies
0 points
Does not describe methods that may be used by public health professionals to influence policy
Score of Key Factors/Impact: Influencing Policy, / 9.5
Role of Public Health Leaders: Supporting the Driving Forces
9.5 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation provides concrete examples
8.55 points
Explains the role that public health leaders can play in supporting the driving forces for the policymaking process
6.65 points
Explains the role that public health leaders can play in supporting the driving forces for the policymaking process, but explanation is incomplete or contains inaccuracies
0 points
Does not explain the role that public health leaders can play in mitigating adverse impacts to the public health workforce
Score of Role of Public Health Leaders: Supporting the Driving Forces, / 9.5
Role of Public Health Leaders: Mitigating the Restraining Forces
9.5 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation demonstrates keen insight into the role that public health leaders can play in mitigating the restraining forces of the policymaking process
8.55 points
Explains the role that public health leaders can play in mitigating the restraining forces of the policymaking process
6.65 points
Explains the role that public health leaders can play in mitigating the restraining forces of the policymaking process, but explanation is incomplete or contains inaccuracies
0 points
Does not explain the role that public health leaders can play in mitigating the restraining forces of the policymaking process
Score of Role of Public Health Leaders: Mitigating the Restraining Forces, / 9.5
Policymaking Process: Policymaking at the National, State, and Local Levels
9.5 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanations demonstrate a detailed understanding of the process at all levels
8.55 points
Explains (1) problem identification, (2) policy analysis, (3) strategy and policy development, (4) policy enactment, and (5) policy implementation at (a) national, (b) state, and (c) local levels
6.65 points
Explains (1) problem identification, (2) policy analysis, (3) strategy and policy development, (4) policy enactment, and (5) policy implementation at (a) national, (b) state, and (c) local levels, but explanations are incomplete or contains inaccuracies
0 points
Does not explain (1) problem identification, (2) policy analysis, (3) strategy and policy development, (4) policy enactment, and (5) policy implementation at (a) national, (b) state, and (c) local levels
Score of Policymaking Process: Policymaking at the National, State, and Local Levels, / 9.5
Policymaking Process: Stakeholder Maps
9.5 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and maps demonstrate an especially insightful analysis of stakeholders and their interests
8.55 points
Creates detailed stakeholder maps at (1) national, (2) state, and (3) local levels
6.65 points
Creates stakeholder maps at (1) national, (2) state, and (3) local levels, but maps lack detail, contains inaccuracies, potential stakeholders are not identified, or their interests accurately represented
0 points
Does not create stakeholder maps at (1) national, (2) state, and (3) local levels
Score of Policymaking Process: Stakeholder Maps, / 9.5
Policymaking Process: Stakeholder Analyses
9.5 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and analysis tables demonstrate keen insight of power vs. stake
8.55 points
Completes detailed stakeholder analysis tables for (a) national, (b) state, and (c) local levels
6.65 points
Completes stakeholder analysis tables for (a) national, (b) state, and (c) local levels, but tables are incomplete, lack detail, or contain inaccuracies
0 points
Does not complete stakeholder analysis tables for (a) national, (b) state, and (c) local levels, but tables are incomplete, lack detail, or contain inaccuracies
Score of Policymaking Process: Stakeholder Analyses, / 9.5
Policymaking Process: Influences of Research and Evaluation on the Policy Process
9.5 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanations of the influence of research and evaluation are especially insightful
8.55 points
Explains the influence of (a) research and (b) evaluation on (1) problem identification, (2) policy analysis, (3) strategy and policy development, (4) policy enactment, and (5) policy implementation
6.65 points
Explains the influence of (a) research and (b) evaluation on (1) problem identification, (2) policy analysis, (3) strategy and policy development, (4) policy enactment, and (5) policy implementation, but explanations are incomplete or contain inaccuracies
0 points
Does not explain the influence of (a) research and (b) evaluation on (1) problem identification, (2) policy analysis, (3) strategy and policy development, (4) policy enactment, and (5) policy implementation
Score of Policymaking Process: Influences of Research and Evaluation on the Policy Process, / 9.5
Legislative Testimony
9.5 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and discussion demonstrates an especially insightful understanding of health advocacy methods and is substantiated by research
8.55 points
Discusses the best practices for influencing legislative bodies using health advocacy methods
6.65 points
Discusses the best practices for influencing legislative bodies using health advocacy methods, but discussion is incomplete or contains inaccuracies
0 points
Does not discuss the best practices for influencing legislative bodies using health advocacy methods
Score of Legislative Testimony, / 9.5
Advocacy Product
9.5 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and fact sheet or infographic demonstrates keen understanding of the audience’s interests
8.55 points
Develops an informative one-page fact sheet or infographic that offers a focused interpretation of evidence for a professional audience
6.65 points
Develops a fact sheet or infographic, but the product falls short of offering a focused interpretation of evidence for a professional audience or demonstrates a lack of understanding of the audience’s interests
0 points
Does not develop an informative one-page fact sheet or infographic that offers a focused interpretation of evidence for a professional audience
Score of Advocacy Product, / 9.5
Articulation of Response
5 points
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format
4.5 points
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
3.5 points
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
0 points
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
Score of Articulation of Response, / 5
Total
Score of Module Four Short Paper Rubric, / 100
Overall Score
Points earned out of 100
91 points minimum
The overall submission earned 91 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
71 points minimum
The overall submission earned 71 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
1 point minimum
The overall submission earned 1 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
0 points minimum
The overall submission earned 0 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.