Assignent Solutionnurs

3-2 Final Project One: Policy Evaluation Proposal
Listen
ReadSpeaker webReader: Listen
Focus
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin®
Turnitin® enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.
Instructions
Use the Policy Evaluation Proposal Template Word Document to submit this final project.
Submit your Final Project One paper here.
For additional details, please refer to the Final Project One Guidelines and Rubric PDF document
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Final Project One Guidelines and Rubric
Print Rubric
Criteria
Exemplary
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Criterion Score
Policy Description
10 points
Meets Proficient criteria and demonstrates keen insight into the connection between the policy and public health
9 points
Summarizes the policy, clarifying the connection between the policy and public health
7 points
Summarizes the policy, clarifying the connection between the policy and public health, but summary is incomplete or contains inaccuracies
0 points
Does not summarize the policy, clarifying the connection between the policy and public health
Score of Policy Description, / 10
Purpose and Context for Policy Evaluation
14 points
Meets Proficient criteria and demonstrates keen insight into the purpose and context of the evaluation
12.6 points
Determines the purpose and context of the evaluation, including who is asking for the information, why the information is needed, how the information will be used, timeline for results, availability of resources, and level of rigor
9.8 points
Determines the purpose and context of the evaluation, including who is asking for the information, why the information is needed, how the information will be used, timeline for results, availability of resources, and level of rigor, but response is incomplete or contains inaccuracies
0 points
Does not determine the purpose and context of the evaluation, including who is asking for the information, why the information is needed, how the information will be used, timeline for results, availability of resources, and level of rigor
Score of Purpose and Context for Policy Evaluation, / 14
Scope of Health Equity Impact
14 points
Meets Proficient criteria and demonstrates keen insight into vulnerable or marginalized populations
12.6 points
Lists the vulnerable or marginalized populations affected by the policy
9.8 points
Lists the vulnerable or marginalized populations affected by the policy, but list is incomplete or contains inaccuracies
0 points
Does not list the vulnerable or marginalized populations affected by the policy
Score of Scope of Health Equity Impact, / 14
Logic Model of Policy (Intended Consequences)
14 points
Meets Proficient criteria and demonstrates keen insight into depicting the pathways between the activities of the specific policy process domain and specific outcomes, and the links between short-term and longer-term outcomes and impacts
12.6 points
Constructs a logic model that displays inputs, outputs, outcomes, and impacts as a sequence, visually depicting the pathways between the activities of the specific policy process domain and specific outcomes, and the links between short-term and longer-term outcomes and impacts
9.8 points
Constructs a logic model that displays inputs, outputs, outcomes, and impacts as a sequence, but logic model is incomplete and/or fails to visually depict the pathways between the activities of the specific policy process domain and specific outcomes, and the links between short-term and longer-term outcomes and impacts
0 points
Does not construct a logic model that displays inputs, outputs, outcomes and impacts as a sequence, visually depicting the pathways between the activities of the specific policy process domain and specific outcomes, and the links between short-term and longer-term outcomes and impacts
Score of Logic Model of Policy (Intended Consequences), / 14
Analysis of Unintended Consequences
14 points
Meets Proficient criteria and demonstrates keen insight into unintended consequences
12.6 points
Specifies the following types of unintended consequences: counterproductive policy effects, ineffective policy effects, and by-products or out-of-scope outcomes or populations
9.8 points
Specifies the following types of unintended consequences: counterproductive policy effects, ineffective policy effects, and by-products or out-of-scope outcomes or populations, but response is incomplete or contains inaccuracies
0 points
Does not specify the following types of unintended consequences: counterproductive policy effects, ineffective policy effects, and by-products or out-of-scope outcomes or populations
Score of Analysis of Unintended Consequences, / 14
Policy Evaluation Proposal Indicators and Collection Strategies
14 points
Meets Proficient criteria and demonstrates keen insight into indicators and collection strategies for one or more of the evaluation questions
12.6 points
Details indicators and collection strategies for (1) formative evaluation question, (2) summative evaluation question, and (3) outcome evaluation question
9.8 points
Details indicators and collection strategies for (1) the formative evaluation question, (2) the summative evaluation question, and (3) the outcome evaluation question, but one or more indicator or collection strategy is/are incorrectly identified
0 points
Does not detail indicators and collection strategies for (1) formative evaluation question, (2) summative evaluation question, and (3) outcome evaluation question
Score of Policy Evaluation Proposal Indicators and Collection Strategies, / 14
Ensuring Evaluation Quality
14 points
Meets Proficient criteria and demonstrates keen insight into the elements of the CDC’s Framework
12.6 points
Assesses the quality using CDC’s Framework for Program Evaluation: (1) utility, (2) feasibility, (3) propriety, and (4) accuracy
9.8 points
Assesses the quality using CDC’s Framework for Program Evaluation: (1) utility, (2) feasibility, (3) propriety, and (4) accuracy, but response is cursory or contains inaccuracies
0 points
Does not assess the quality using CDC’s Framework for Program Evaluation: (1) utility, (2) feasibility, (3) propriety, and (4) accuracy
Score of Ensuring Evaluation Quality, / 14
Articulation of Response
6 points
Submission has no errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax
5.4 points
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax
4.2 points
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
0 points
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas
Score of Articulation of Response, / 6
Total
Score of Final Project One Guidelines and Rubric, / 100
Overall Score
Points earned out of 100
91 points minimum
The overall submission earned 91 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
71 points minimum
The overall submission earned 71 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
1 point minimum
The overall submission earned 1 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
0 points minimum
The overall submission earned 0 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Associated Learning Objectives
Learning Objective
Assessment Method: Score on Criteria – Policy Description
Required Performance: Proficient
Learning Objective
Assessment Method: Score on Criteria – Purpose and Context for Policy Evaluation
Required Performance: Proficient
Learning Objective
Assessment Method: Score on Criteria – Scope of Health Equity Impact
Required Performance: Proficient
Learning Objective
Assessment Method: Score on Criteria – Logic Model of Policy (Intended Consequences)
Required Performance: Proficient
Learning Objective
Assessment Method: Score on Criteria – Analysis of Unintended Consequences
Required Performance: Proficient
Learning Objective
Assessment Method: Score on Criteria – Policy Evaluation Proposal Indicators and Collection Strategies
Required Performance: Proficient
Learning Objective
Assessment Method: Score on Criteria – Ensuring Evaluation Quality
Required Performance: Proficient
Submit Assignment