Phenomenon of
Interest
1. Identify the
selected
Phenomenon of
Interest (POI) and
briefly describe its
importance to
your advanced
nursing practice
specialty focus.
2. Provide at least
one (1) current
peer-reviewed
reference
Philosophical
Influences
1. Describe your
preferred
philosophical
viewpoint
(Analytic or
Continental) and
how it impacts
your view of your
POI or advanced
nursing practice
specialty.
2. Provide at least
two (2) peer-
reviewed
references. Classic
literature may be
older than five
years.
Ethical Framework
1. Identify the
ethical framework
that will guide
decision-making in
your advanced
practice role and
provide a brief
description of the
chosen ethical
framework.
2. Identify and
briefly describe
two (2) ethical
principles
associated with
the chosen ethical
framework.
3. Provide at least
two (2) peer-
reviewed
references. Classic
literature may be
older than five
years.
Theoretical
Influences
1. Describe the
Grand Nursing
Theory and
Middle Range
theory you
selected for your
framework and
how the theories
guide your view of
your POI or area
of advanced
nursing practice
specialty.
2. Describe a CAS
related to your
POI or advanced
nursing practice
specialty,
3. Provide at least
three (3) peer-
reviewed
references, citing
PRIMARY sources
of literature.
Classic literaturemay be older than
five years.
Concept Map of
Praxis Framework
1. Briefly describe
the Praxis
Framework that
will guide your
future advanced
practice role in no
more than one
paragraph.
2. Construct a
Concept Map of
your Praxis
framework and
attach it to the
initial forum. The
graphic
representation
should Include the
following
elements:
(a) The
phenomenon of
Interest (POI)
b) The Concept
Analysis you
selected with
relevance to the
POI
(c) Philosophical
influences
1.5 to >1.35 pts
Exceeds
Expectations
A fully developed
Concept Map is
attached and
includes all of the
required elements
as a graphic
representation.
1.35 to >1.2 pts
Meets Expectations
A basic concept map is
attached, and it includes
the required elements
with basic graphic
representation.
1.2 to >1.05 pts
Needs Improvement
A concept map is
attached with minimal
details. Some required
elements may be
missing. Graphic
representation may be
missing.
1.05 to >0 pts
Inadequate
The information is
missing or is
inadequate to
satisfy the required
elements.
1.5 pts
(viewpoints)
(d) Theoretical
influences (Grand,
middle, and
complexity
theory)
(e) Ethical
framework and
principles
3. Provide citation
and reference for
the selected
Concept Analysis
article.
Substantial Cross-
post
1. Contribute
substantial cross-
post to a
minimum of two
(2) students.
2. No citations or
references
required for cross-
posts.
3. Max 300 words
per cross-post
Graduate Level
Scholarship
1. Scholarly
writing style; the
first-person
language is
permitted in the
discussion
2. Introduction
and conclusion
not required for
this Discussion.
3. Organize work
by headings.
4. Writing should
be clear and
concise.
5. The initial post
includes a
minimum of eight
(8) peer-reviewed
references.
6. Citations and
references follow
APA format.
7. Writing should
be free of APA
errors, excluding
line spacing in
1 to >0.9 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Demonstrates
graduate-level
scholarship with one
(1) to two (2) types of
error (the error type
may have been
repeated several
times). Faculty
discretion will apply.
0.9 to >0.8 pts
Meets Expectations
Demonstrates
minimal graduate-
level scholarship with
three (3) types of
errors (the error type
may have been
repeated multiple
times). Faculty
discretion will apply.
0.8 to >0.7 pts
Needs Improvement
Does not demonstrate
graduate-level scholarship
with four (4) types of errors
(the error type may have
been repeated multiple
times). Faculty discretion
will apply.
0.7 to >0 pts
Inadequate
Graduate-level
scholarship missing, with
five (5) or more types of
errors (the error type
may have been repeated
multiple times). Faculty
discretion will apply.
1 pts
Forum
Discussions.
8. Writing should
be free of
grammatical and
spelling errors.
9. Initial post not
to exceed 1000
words (excluding
reference list);
cross-post not to
exceed 300 words
(excluding
references).
10. Follow all
assignment
instructions, and
do not use direct
quotes unless
providing a brief
definition.
11. Demonstrate
good overall
writing skills.
12. This discussion
is not subject toTurnitin’s review.