Assignent Solutionnurs

References: Abrams, D. E., Cahn, N. R., Ross, C. J., Meyer, D. D. (2009). Contemporary family law (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West. American Psychological Association. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271–285. American Psychological Association. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology. American Psychologist, 68, 7–19. American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: Author. Andrews, D. A, & Bonta, J. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 39–55. Chandler, R. K., Peters, R. H., Field, G., & Juliano-Bult, D. (2004). Challenges in implementing evidence-based treatment practices for co-occurring disorders in the criminal justice system. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 22, 431–448. Day, A., & Howells, K. (2002). Psychological treatments for rehabilitating offenders: Evidence-based practice comes of age. Australian Psychologist, 37, 39–47. DeMatteo, D., Burl, J., Filone, S., & Heilbrun, K. (2016). Training in forensic assessment and intervention: Implications for principle-based models. In R. Jackson & R. Roesch, Learning forensic assessment: Research and practice (2nd ed., pp. 14–31). New York, NY: Routledge. Dubowitz, H., & DePanfilis, D. E. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook for child protection practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Elwork, A. (1992). Psycho-legal treatment and intervention: The next challenge. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 175–183. Leschied, A., Bernfeld, G., & Farrington, D. (2001). Implementation issues. In G. Bernfeld, D. Farrington, & A. Leschied (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice (pp. 3–24). Chichester, UK: Wiley. Palmer, J. W. (2010). Constitutional rights of prisoners (9th ed.). New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis. Slobogin, C., Hafemeister, T. L., Mossman, D., & Reisner, R. (2013). Law and the mental health system: Civil and criminal aspects (6th ed.). St. Paul, MN: West. Tafrate, R. C., & Mitchell, D. (Eds.). (2014). Forensic CBT: A handbook for clinical practice. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley. Welsh, B., & Farrington, D. (2001). Evaluating the economic efficiency of correctional intervention programs. In G. Bernfeld, D. Farrington, & A. Leschied (Eds.), Offender ABOVE IS THE REFERENCE LIST NEEDED TO COMPLETE THIS ESSAY. I have included the following attachments: Instructions and grading rubric (also listed below); a sample writing from my professor and a sample from a 100% A+ graded student (DO NOT COPY, THESE ARE FOR REFERENCE AND GUIDANCE); and Principles of Forensic Mental Health Assessment Text (to help write this paper). Extra Credit Intervention Principles Paper Instructions and Grading Rubric: The rationales of this assignment are to : (a) have you think about forensic treatment from a principles-based perspective (which I believe is a useful way to think about/bring together course content); and (b) give you practice critically integrating legal, ethical, scientific, and practice sources of authority (which you’ll need to do in practice, given the still-developing nature of forensic interventions). For this assignment, you are to: (1) skim and incorporate (APA Style citations) all of the readings from the closed universe of sources (available on the course Canvas site) as you (2) generate general forensic intervention principles (at least 10, no more than 20) in the vein of forensic mental health assessment principles, (3) that at least address the overarching topics of service recipients, providers, and systems; and (4) for each of which you briefly describe support from legal, ethical, scientific, and practice sources of authority (that is, address all four domains for each principle, writing approximately a paragraph for each domain, unless you can distill the support further); or the absence of such support (in which case you’ll just say that in a sentence, rather than writing a paragraph for that domain) Grading criteria Possible points Points assigned Principles stylized akin to (in the form of) forensic mental health assessment principles in DeMatteo, Burl, Filone, & Heilbrun (2016) reading (yes, no): 0.5 Incorporation of all 15 readings (yes, majority, no) 0.5 Between 10 and 20 principles, unless able to provide good rationale for deviating (yes, reasonably over/under, unreasonably over/under): 0.5 Principles at least address delivery at the (a) provider and (b) systems levels and (c) generalization for criminal and civil/family service recipients, among other topics you might generate (at least both, at least one, neither) 0.5 Each principle briefly notes (with APA Style references) presence or absence of legal-, ethical-, scientific-, and practice-based support, and if present (yes, somewhat, no) 3 Total 5