Assignent Solutionnurs

IMPORTANT NOTE: 750 WORDS, 3 CITED SOURCES, ONE BEING A COURT CASE. You will do a case study based on some of the ethical dilemmas surrounding sonography and the medical field. You will first need to identify the ethical dilemma and find a court case that is surrounding that topic. You will need to then summarize the court case, to include, ethical dilemma, important facts, and outcome. I would like you to discuss your feelings on the way that the case was handled. How would it have been prevented? What could the medical personnel have done differently? Why were things handled in a way that would lead to a court case? You will need to end the paper by giving your personal feelings about this topic. The paper should be at least 750 words and cited using APA format. Rubric is as follows Resource Citation Excellent – Cites all data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is used in both text and reference page. Good – Cites most data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is used in both text and reference page. Needs Improvement – Cites some data obtained from other sources. The citation style is either inconsistent or incorrect. Poor – Does not cite sources. * Plagiarism will result in a grade of zero for the entire paper. * 10 points Format Excellent – Paper follows APA formatting guidelines. 25 Good – 1-3 formatting issues. 20 Needs Improvement – 4-5 formatting issues. 15 Poor – 6 or more formatting issues. 0 25 points Grammar Excellent – No obvious grammar errors. 10 Good – 1-3 mistakes regarding language structure and convention. 7 Needs Improvement – 4-5 mistakes regarding language structure and convention. 4 Poor – 6 or more language structure and conventions errors. 0 10 points Organization Excellent – The paper is clear, easy to understand, and the topics flow smoothly. 25 Good – The topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic. However, the writer has not established a position. 20 Needs Improvement – Paper is inconsistent in its organization and does not flow easily between topics or thoughts are not fully developed. 15 Poor – Paper does not flow and is difficult to follow. 10 25 points Content Excellent – In-depth discussion & elaboration in all sections of the paper. The subject has been thoughtfully researched using 2 or more credible sources. The subject is thoroughly conveyed in the paper. The required word count is met. – 30 Good – One credible source was used; however, the subject’s significant components were not conveyed in the assignment. In-depth discussion & elaboration in most sections of the paper. Required word count – 100 – 25 Needs Improvement – One credible source was used. The writer has omitted pertinent content or content runs-on excessively. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively. Required word count – 150 – 20 Poor – No credible sources were used, and the subject was not thoroughly researched or conveyed. Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections. Required word count – <200 - 10